Friday, 18 April 2014
Thursday, 3 April 2014
The presentation was aboutTechnology Enhanced Learning and covered a variety of general and specific themes. It was all interesting, most of it covered topics and ideas that I am already aware of but the majority of the audience were not from education or academia so it was very relevant to them.
Technological and digital solutions to issues with online assessment
Learning Analytics to inform learning strategies
Ease of access
Technology has to be at heart of the solution - need to train people in IT
Take advantage of new possibilities. MOOCs disruptive (good and bad) - no attempt to save - sink or swim - online has poor success rates. Most MOOC learners already have degree so why is success rate so low?
Adaptive interfaces and personalisation of the environment
Engaging and immersive environments - relative depersonalisation of the learning experience but online learning has potential to provide a different range of learning experiences
Games provide social personalisation, progression at own pace, repetition and reinforcement
Socialisation - isolation but some people may feel more able to socialise online, need moderation, Minerva project
Personalisation - environment can be built to adapt to an individuals needs, can provide personalisation en masse, online systems can provide online feedback that is personalised.
Deterrents eg setting intermediate targets
Verifiable biometric authentication but not easy to put in all the measures
Tuesday, 1 April 2014
It was a very interesting presentation and and highlighted many aspects of university league tables and student surveys that everyone is aware of and form an important part of the activities that we do. In advance everyone was asked to look at their institution’s league table position on the following websites plus your institutions NSS results.
The Guardian University Guide - http://www.theguardian.com/education/table/2013/jun/03/university-league-table-2014
The Good University Guide - http://www.thesundaytimes.co.uk/sto/University_Guide/
The Times one seems to be the one thathas most impact, that most people look at.
Any improvements take time to manifest - it's cumulative and it takes time but sometimes you have to convince senior management that the improvements that you're making will impact on the position in the league table. It is also possible that when you improve, you increase points in the table but don't go up places.
Institutions use peer grouping to compare and benchmark with similar universities to address the problem that you're not comparing like with like eg UWS v Edinburgh. There is no scope to explain the background.
It's possible to use other statistics such as Unistats with Key Information Sets http://unistats.direct.gov.uk/
As far as the NSS is concerned....well it's a 'blunt instrument' and the library question is almost meaningless. It's based on what we think students value.
But it is what we've got and we have to make sure that we get the best results from it as possible. Participation is a challenge and each year, at each institution, various persuasive methods are used in order to encourage students to respond. I think we tread the line between survey fatigue and putting other more useful surveys or feedback on hold so that they don't distract from the NSS.
There is also theNSSE National Survey of Student Engagement which is focused on student engagement. http://nsse.iub.edu/
How do you know why or what makes you go up or down.
Making an impact through information skills SMILE @GCU.
There is also a mobile version of smile called smirk :)
The next presentation was also about information skills and was by Marion Kennedy and Catherine Ure who are Subject Librarians where I work at Heriot-Watt University.
Making an impact through information skills Power Hours @ Heriot-Watt
They explained that the Power Hours are about a variety of topics and delivered by staff across the University as well as in the Information Services. They are advertised in a variety of ways including leaflets and handouts, the website and via social media.
The impact is measured by attendance statistics and by anecdotal evidence. There is a feedback form at the end of each session which is analysed. 94% of participants agree /strongly agree that the Power Hours are useful to studies and research. This evidence is used to raise the profile of the sessions. Staff direct students to the sessions, academic staff request tailored sessions and also academics deliver some sessions.
The next two sessions were case studies based around Making an impact through space.
Firstly Margaret Buchan, Associate Director of Library Services, Robert Gordon University spoke about the new library at RGU. She explained what they used to do and how they had planned in advance to do things differently when they moved to 'The Tower'. There was no room for a traditional service / issue desk so they have a welcome desk instead which is staffed by reception staff. The reception staff were recruited for customer service skills not library skills experience. There are library staff on each of the other floors to help students on that floor and they communicate with staff in different areas via wireless headsets. There is no space for group study areas but they do have some provision for groups in another building.
An interesting aspect was that the staff area is 'hot desking' and this seemed to work well for them.
The next speaker was Laurence Bebbington, Acting University Librarian & Director, University of Aberdeen. He explained the concept of the Aberdeen Library with flexible spaces that are technology rich. It is a building of architectural merit with public spaces and a very impressive atrium. There is one dewey sequence throughout the library and plenty of study spaces with power and data on desks. There is a strong emphasis on self service including self collection of reservations.
During lunchtime there was an opportunity to look round the library. It is a very nice building and some great group study rooms.
The first session of the afternoon was a presentation by Graham Stone, Information Resources Manager/Senior Research Fellow, University of Huddersfield Library analytics: understanding impact and value.
It was a very interesting talk and I have read about the work that has been done on these projects. (My notes don't reflect how useful and informative the talk was).
Graham talked about how library data has been used at Huddersfield to improve existing services and how library data is 'linked' to student attainment. They found that there is a statistical significance between the final grade achieved, number of books borrowed and number of times e-resources were accessed.
In phase 2 of the project they are looking at library data and student demographics, discipline, retention, on/off campus and the breadth and depth of e resource usage. They are also looking at library usage by age and by country of domicile and how this affects retention. Does the depth and breadth of the library collection have impact on attainment? Non usage of library resources could indicate disengagement with workload and lack of performance.
Analytics are becoming a strategic priority within libraries / information services / universities.
Their current project is Jisc LAMP http://infteam.jiscinvolve.org/wp/2013/02/01/jisc-lamp-shedding-light-on-library-data-and-metrics/
They are looking for benefits of scale with future work and a shared library analytics service. Analytics dashboards and engines are the way forward with compelling visualisations.
The final two presentations were about Making an impact through resources. Robbie Ireland, University of Glasgow talked about Reading lists @Glasgow.
Then Lisa Haddow, Team Manager, Library Liaison & Development and Valerie Wells, Senior Subject Librarian, University of Stirling talked about Resource Lists @Stirling. Again they use Talis Aspire but the lists, and all the work, is done by the library staff. Students have dynamic up to date accurate lists. The list appears in the Blackboard course (as a resources list ). Academic staff don't have to manage the resource list but get statistics to show usage. The librarians use the list as a means of showing library resource usage and effectiveness. Their information strategy expects more than 80% of modules to have resources lists.
The whole day was great and I very much enjoyed it. It is organised by Dilys Young (Librarian and Assistant Director, University of Strathclyde) and Sonya Campbell (Customer Service Development Manager, GCU) who ensure that there are interesting speakers and well facilitated discussions. The pace of the event was quite fast, as there was lots to talk about and do, which suits me well. The last event in Edinburgh was also a very useful day and the attendees are all interesting and easy to talk to - great networking opportunities. If you are a library / information services person in Scotland, interested in customer services, i would recommend joining the group and attending an event.